The Solar System: Do Scientists Really Know How It Formed?

The vast differences between the planets do notretains a molten core. So, if earth also went through
seem to support the accepted scientific theories ofextreme heat during its infancy, why didn't water on
their formation.The theory held by many scientistsearth take the same course as water on Venus? By
concerning the evolution of our solar system isthe time earth cooled, there should have been about
basically that a large gas cloud in space condensedas much water left on it as there is on Venus today --
into what we now call the sun. Chunks of this cloudpractically none.Furthermore, there is no evidence
flew off into orbit around the sun and eventuallyindicating that there was ever any large volume of
condensed into planets. That is, the other planets in ourwater on Venus. There are no gullies, trenches, or
solar system were allegedly formed by the samecraters left vacant by oceans, lakes, or rivers. If all the
process which formed our own planet, earth.Soundwaters on earth were to disappear, they'd leave some
logical? It might have -- in the eighteenth century. Notunmistakable natural landmarks behind.The answer
today. Space exploration does not seem to supportgiven by some is that perhaps Venus' high
this.EXPLORATION OF VENUSOn February 12, 1961,temperatures never allowed water to even reach a
the Soviet Union launched Venera 1 into solar orbit,liquid state.Then why is there no water on Mars? Mars
making it one of the earliest attempts to probe Venus.is cooler and farther away from the sun than Venus
By the time Veneras 13 and 14 landed on Venus inand even earth; it has no scorching atmosphere, but it
early 1982, man had already landed several modulesis an extremely dry planet. That is, Mars does not
on Venus which relayed good data back to earth.have the kind of atmosphere which might have kept
Throughout these missions it became painfully clear towater from condensing or might have caused water
scientists that the real Venus had no resemblance toto disappear as it allegedly did on Venus. Yet, Mars
the Venus about which they had theorized before thehas only some ice at the poles and small traces of
probes.Venus was once thought of as "earth's twin." Itwater vapor in the atmosphere. No oceans, rivers,
is our nearest neighbor in the solar system, and it isglaciers, or even ponds. Where did all the water on
approximately the same size and density as earth.Mars go? Or why wasn't any there to begin with?So,
Although Venus intercepts twice as much sunlight asyou see, no matter what your vantage point, earth's
earth because it is closer to the sun, it was thoughtsurface being 70 percent covered with water is, from
that its surface conditions were similar to earth's sincean evolutionary standpoint, an inexplicable phenomena.
the thick global clouds of Venus reflected most of theDid the planets really evolve of the same stuff in
extra light. Scientists reasoned further that since earthspace? Did they evolve at all? It certainly does not
and Venus condensed from the interstellar clouds ofseem that way. How do you explain three planets right
the same region in space their elemental compositionnext to each other, one is a dry oven, one is an arid
must be roughly the same.The theories about Venusdesert, and the one in the middle is flooded with
went as far as saying that its atmosphere was madewater? Evolution? Think again.And while you're thinking,
up of the same gases as that of earth, and one daytry explaining why earth has a magnetic field while
on Venus was about the same length as a day onVenus does not. And why Venus revolves differently
earth.The picture we had of Venus was of a planetfrom the other planets. And why most of the planets
similar to earth except for something of a "murkyare flat at the poles while Venus is round. And why
jungle" spanning the entire globe. The impressionthe surface of Venus is smooth in comparison to that
scientists gave was that astronauts landing on Venusof earth and Mars. Because the planets in our solar
would need little more than London Fog coats.Assystem were formed by the same evolutionary
exploration of Venus proceeded, facts began replacingprocess? There is no better proof than the planets
completely erroneous theories. Not only werethemselves that presently held theories of planetary
conditions on Venus not what we had anticipated, butevolution do not "hold water."A BETTER
the data returned by the Venera and Mariner missionsTHEORYMaybe what we need is simply another
showed Venus to be so different that it appearedimaginative theory concerning the disappearance of
highly unlikely that earth and Venus could have evolvedwater on Venus: About 648 million ago, 7 billion little
from the same gas clouds. We found Venus to be aaliens with big bladders landed on Venus in a
far more hostile environment than the "murky jungle"spaceship the size of Krakatoa. They drank up all the
we had envisioned.So much so, that Venus' climate iswater, then flew to earth and went to the men's room.
probably more hostile than any other planet in our solar(The women stayed home to take care of the babies
system. The only ones more disappointed than-- with bladders like that, babies need a lot of
scientists were Bangladesh tigers -- they wereattention.)THEORIES DO NOT CHANGE FACTSThe
convinced that after death they went up to the junglesquestion of whether scientific accounts of the origin
of Venus.Here's an idea of what it's like on Venus: theand evolution of the planets actually occurred is
temperature is around 900 degrees Fahrenheit -- that'spremature at this point. There's a more fundamental
great vacation weather, if you happen to be a tubequestion here: do theories of planetary evolution make
worm with poor circulation. The atmosphere is aboutany sense? In spite of the onslaught of "scientific"
97 percent carbon dioxide, as compared to earth'stheories, which sometimes give the impression of being
atmosphere of about 90 percent nitrogen anddesigned to make sense out of the irrational, our
oxygen.Bright sunny days on Venus are nonexistent;space explorations seem to indicate that these
every day is like a heavy overcast. And if the sun didtheories make no sense.Strangely, here on earth,
come out, you could never go to the beach on Venusaccurate weather predictions are limited to a matter of
because there are no oceans. Venus is so dry thatdays. The course of such commonplace weather
the relative humidity rarely reaches one percent; forgetconditions as storms and hurricanes sometimes cannot
about "raindrops fallin' on your head." But then, onbe accurately predicted a mere twenty four hours in
Venus, the last thing you'd want is rain. Rain on "earth'sadvance. But somehow, there are "experts" who can
twin" consists of sulfuric acid. Such a rain wouldstate with astonishing certainty how the weather
dissolve sulfur, mercury, lead, tin, and most rocks. Topatterns on Venus over alleged billions of years
go out in weather like that your Totes hat would needcaused entire oceans to go up into space and down
a lining made of tempered steel, and Tarzan wouldinto rocks. Maybe we ought to send some scientists to
have to wear a lot more than "Fruit of the Loom."If youlive on Venus so they can give us better weather
still think conditions on Venus are similar to those ofpredictions here on earth?NEW TOOLSThe problem
earth, I strongly suggest you move to differentapparently is that scientists are trying to solve new
neighborhood -- your current one has completelypuzzles -- puzzles brought about by space exploration
deteriorated.Venus has a surface pressure of about-- with outdated "tools" -- old theories. It's time to stop
90 times that of earth, which is the equivalent of goingbending and twisting these tools in a futile attempt to
about a half mile down into the ocean. The sun rises inmake them fit the facts. It's time to get new tools.
the west and sets in the east.One day on VenusWhat we need are theories which fit the facts and do
takes approximately eight earth months; a couple livingnot pretend to explain that which they do not. We
on Venus could have a baby almost everyneed theories which do not become obsolete every
"day."AGAIN, CONTRADICTIONSOf all the greattime science takes another step forward. Perhaps
differences between earth and Venus, one in particularsuch theories will come when we finally realize that
poses a very strong and obvious question: if earth andalthough every physical phenomenon must have an
Venus formed of the same gas clouds, how can 70origin, not every origin must necessarily be of a
percent of earth's surface be covered with water yetphysical nature. Is it possible the Solar System was
the only trace of water on Venus is a relative humidityactually Created, or Directed to form, in its current
of about one percent? What happened to all thestate? You have a better explanation?by Josh
water on Venus? Or, where did all the water on earthGreenberger
come from?AND THEN, THE THEORIESOne theory,This has been an excerpt from his free book on
and perhaps even the only one, about where all theevolution at EvolutionDead.comJosh Greenberger: A
water on Venus went is this: millions of years ago, thecomputer consultant for over two decades, the author
greenhouse effect of Venus' atmosphere caused itshas developed software for such organizations as
temperatures to soar above 2000 degrees Fahrenheit.NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies, AT&T,
This caused water to break up into hydrogen andCharles Schwab, Bell Laboratories and Chase
oxygen. The hydrogen escaped into space and theManhattan Bank. Since 1984, the author's literary works
oxygen mixed with molten rock forming the Venusianhave appeared in such periodicals as The New York
crust.Then why is there a large volume of water onPost, The Daily News, The Village Voice, The Jewish
earth?Scientific studies suggest that earth, during itsPress, and others. His articles have ranged from humor
alleged formation, was hot enough that to this day itto scientific to topical events. Visit his site: shopndrop.